At the absorbing stage: the centre is the strict transform, under Włodarczyk's Claim #
In the proof of [Wlo05, Theorem 4.7.1], at the moment the strict transform Ỹ₁ of a component is
the centre, the controlled transform of I has order 1 along Ỹ₁ and is its ideal near Ỹ₁ —
Włodarczyk's Claim. In Kollár's setting it is the proposition ClaimKC
(Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedHypotheses): at the first stage n whose centre D
contains the strict transform c̃ of a member c, the nonmonomial part N(I_n) of the marked
ideal agrees with c̃ at every point of c̃. ClaimKC fails for the order of the steps of
BMO_1 used here (see that module); this module draws, CONDITIONALLY on it, the consequences the
loop would need. The unconditional replacements are proved from the local form of the ideal
(Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedCP2Entry: the strict transform of an absorbed member
is smooth, integral, with simple normal crossings with the boundary, and disjoint from the other
members).
stalkIdeal_center_eq_of_absorbed— at every pointpofc̃,D_p = c̃_p:D ≤ c̃by the stop rule; converselyI_n ≤ D(the centre lies in the cosupport, [Kol07, Definition 66 (4′)]),I_n = M(I_n) · N(I_n)(the splitting of [Kol07, Definition–Lemma 110]) andN(I_n)_p = c̃_p(Włodarczyk's Claim), soM(I_n)_p · c̃_p ≤ D_pwithD_pPRIME (the centre is smooth,𝒪_p / D_pa regular local ring, a domain);M(I_n)_p ⊄ D_psince a piece of the boundary containingDnearpwould contain the generic point ofc̃, which lies on no member of the boundary.hasSncWith_strictTransformSeq_of_absorbed,smooth_strictTransformSeq_of_absorbed—c̃has simple normal crossings with the boundary at stagenand is smooth: [Kol07, Definition 24 (4)] is read at the points ofc̃, wherec̃has the stalks of the centre, which has snc with the boundary ([Kol07, Definition 66 (3′)]); smoothness byHasSncWith.smooth.stalkIdeal_markedTransformSeq_eq_mul_of_absorbed—I_n = M(I_n) · I_c̃at the points ofc̃(Włodarczyk'sσ^c(I) = I_Ỹ₁with the monomial part).
All statements are at the run's stage n.castSucc (the index form). The unconditional lemmas of
the first section (val_le_firstCenterIndex_of_absorbed,
exists_genericPoint_strictTransformSeq_of_absorbed, markedTransformSeq_le_center_of_absorbed)
are stated without the hypothesis ClaimKC and are used elsewhere.
The data of an absorbed member: T a marked triple of mark 1, η the generic point of a
component of V(T.I) lying on no member of the boundary at which T.I agrees with the component's
reduced ideal c, and n the FIRST centre index of the run whose centre contains the strict
transform of c.
The stage n is at most the first containing index of the member.
The proof of [Kol07, Corollary 22] for the absorbed member: the strict transform c̃ at stage
n has a generic point η', the unique point over η, transported by isomorphisms of stalks and
lying on no member of the boundary at stage n.
The centre agrees with the strict transform at its points (K2a) #
The fine monomial part of the marked ideal at the absorbing stage is not contained in the
centre's stalk at a point of the absorbed strict transform: a piece of the boundary containing the
centre near p would, by generization to the generic point η' of the strict transform, contain
η' — which lies on no member of the boundary.
[Kol07, Definition 66 (4′)]: the marked ideal at the absorbing stage is contained in the
centre's ideal — the centre lies in the cosupport (order ≥ 1 at its generic points), and the
centre is reduced (smooth).
Under the hypothesis ClaimKC (Włodarczyk's Claim; false for the transcribed order): at every
point p of the absorbed strict transform c̃, the centre's stalk is c̃'s — D ≤ c̃ by the
stop rule; conversely I_n ≤ D, I_n = M(I_n) · N(I_n) and N(I_n)_p = c̃_p
(Włodarczyk's Claim) give M(I_n)_p · c̃_p ≤ D_p, D_p is prime, and M(I_n)_p ⊄ D_p.
K2, K1, K3 #
Under the hypothesis ClaimKC: the absorbed strict transform has simple normal crossings with
the boundary at stage n — [Kol07, Definition 24 (4)] read at its points, where its stalks are the
centre's (stalkIdeal_center_eq_of_absorbed) and the centre has snc with the boundary
([Kol07, Definition 66 (3′)]). The unconditional form is in
Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedCP2Entry.
Under the hypothesis ClaimKC: the absorbed strict transform is smooth over k
(HasSncWith.smooth). The unconditional form is in
Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedCP2Entry.
Under the hypothesis ClaimKC: at every point of the absorbed strict transform, the marked
ideal is the monomial part times the strict transform's ideal (Włodarczyk's Claim with the monomial
part of [Kol07, Definition–Lemma 110]).