The strict transform of a reduced subscheme is the product of those of its components #
Clause (c) of [Wlo05, Theorem 1.0.2] speaks of the strict transform Ỹ of the reduced subscheme
Y, while [Wlo05, Theorem 4.7.1] and its proof work with the strict transforms of the irreducible
components Y_i. The bridge is bookkeeping about strict transforms of reduced ideals, assembled
here from Hironaka/Resolution/Algebraic/Wlo05/EmbeddedPullbackTools.lean (the strict transform of
a reduced closed subscheme stays reduced along a sequence, isReduced_strictTransformSeq_subscheme;
the support of the strict transform of a finite union is the union of the strict transforms'
supports, coe_support_strictTransformSeq_biUnion; a reduced ideal is the vanishing ideal of its
support, vanishingIdeal_support_of_isReduced): when the strict transforms of the components at
a stage are pairwise disjoint, the strict transform of Y at that stage is their product
(vanishingIdeal_iSup_support_eq_prod), and simple normal crossings with the boundary pass from
the factors to the product pointwise.
The strict transform of a reduced ideal whose support is the union of the supports of finitely many reduced ideals is, at a stage where the strict transforms of those are pairwise disjoint, the product of their strict transforms: both sides are reduced with the same support. This passes from the disjoint strict transforms of the components in [Wlo05, Theorem 4.7.1] to the strict transform of the subvariety in [Wlo05, Theorem 1.0.2 (c)].
Simple normal crossings with a family pass from finitely many pairwise disjoint closed subschemes to their product: at a point of the product's support exactly one factor passes, and the product's stalk is that factor's stalk.