Lemma 102 in the compatible-family form: the order clause and clause (1) #
The two clauses of [Kol07, Lemma 102] about the sequence itself, for the value BDanFam on a
relatively compact open U (BDFam.lean): it is a smooth blow-up sequence of order m starting
with the restricted triple (BDanFam_isOfOrder), and at its end the strict transform of E^j
misses cosupp(I_r, m) (BDanFam_cosupp_disjoint, clause (1)). By coreFamOn_eq_coreOfListOf
(BDFamTransport.lean) the core on U is the core over the input's value transported to the
restricted data, so the clauses are those of the core over a sequence
(Hironaka/Resolution/Analytic/OrderReduction/BD.lean) once the input family's clauses on its open
are transported along the two local analytic isomorphisms of the transport, the bundle
diffeomorphism and the restricted lift, and the restricted triple of the restricted data is
identified with the pull-back of the restricted triple along the composite
(restrictedTripleOf_restrict_eq; the proof of Lemma 102: restricting and pulling back commute).
The clauses hold first at the mark s = tuningParam m for the tuned triple, on which BDanFam
runs, and are carried back to (๐, m) by orderReduction_tuned_iff and ord_lt_of_tuned
(TunedLemmas.lean), as for BDan in BDCore.lean and BDCosupp.lean.
Zminus1_restrict,transformSU_eqโ the centre and the transform of the restricted data are the restrictions ofZ_{-1}andS_0;noEmptyCenters_transportedValue,isOfOrderGe_transportedValue,ord_lt_transportedValueโ the transported value inherits the input's three properties;coreFamOn_isOfOrderGe,coreFamOn_cosupp_disjointโ the clauses for the core onU;BDanFam_isOfOrder,BDanFam_cosupp_disjointโ the clauses for the value ofBD_{n,m,j}onU.
These are the isOfOrder and cosupp_disjoint fields of Lemma 102's family data
bdanFamDataOfInput in BOanFamOfInput.lean.
The centre of the restricted data is the restriction of Z_{-1} (BD.Zminus1_comap for the
inclusion of U).
The transform of E^j in the restricted blowing-up is the transform of the restricted data.
The transported value has no empty centres: it is the input's value, which has none, pulled back twice along surjective local analytic isomorphisms.
The composite of the two transport maps followed by the inclusion of the trace is the
restriction of the lift of the inclusion to the transforms of E^j (equal on the underlying
points).
The restricted triple of the restricted data is the pull-back of the restricted triple of T
along the composite transport map ("we get the same result" whether one first pulls back or
first restricts, the proof of [Kol07, Lemma 102]; restrictedTripleOf_isPullbackOf).
The clause "the controlled transform at the last stage has order < m" pulls back along a
local analytic isomorphism: the controlled transform of the pull-back at the last stage is the
pull-back of the controlled transform along the last lift, and the order is read at the image.
The transported value is a smooth blow-up sequence of order โฅ s for the restricted triple of
the restricted data: the input family's clause on its open, pulled back twice.
The controlled transform of the transported value at the last stage has order < s
everywhere: the input family's clause on its open, pulled back twice.
The order clause for the core on U at the mark s: it is a smooth blow-up sequence of order
โฅ s for the restricted triple (coreOfListOf_isOfOrderGe at the transported value).
Clause (1) of [Kol07, Lemma 102] for the core on U at the mark s: the strict transform of
E^j at the end misses cosupp(I_r, s) (coreOfListOf_cosupp_disjoint at the transported
value).
The tuned triple restricted to U lies in the class of the core (the tuning commutes with the
restriction, tuned_pullback).
The order clause of [Kol07, Lemma 102] ("a smooth blow-up sequence functor BD_{n,m,j} of order
m") for the value on U: BDanFam m inp T hT j U hU is a smooth blow-up sequence of order
exactly m starting with the restricted triple. The core's clause at the mark s = tuningParam m
on the tuned triple is carried back to (๐, m) by orderReduction_tuned_iff; the order is exactly
m because ord ๐ โค m everywhere.
Clause (1) of [Kol07, Lemma 102], "cosupp(I_r, m) โฉ ฮ ^{-1}_*(E^j) = โ
", for the value on U:
the strict transform of E^j at the end of BDanFam m inp T hT j U hU misses cosupp(I_r, m).
The core's clause at the mark s = tuningParam m on the tuned triple is carried back to (๐, m)
by ord_lt_of_tuned.