Concatenation of blow-up sequences: the marked order condition and the end data #
The marked order condition of [Kol07, Definition 66] (a smooth blow-up sequence of order ≥ m
starting with (X, I, m, E), IsOrderGeSeq) along a concatenation: a sequence of order ≥ m for
(X, I, m, E) followed by one of order ≥ m for the induced marked triple
(X_r, Π^{-1}_*(I, m), m, Π^{-1}_{tot} E) is a sequence of order ≥ m for (X, I, m, E). This is
the marked analogue of isOrderSeq_concat (Hironaka/Scheme/BlowUpSequence/ConcatApi.lean). In the
proof of Theorem 107 [Kol07, 111, Step 1] the order reduction of the nonmonomial part is a
concatenation of rounds, each of order ≥ m for the marked ideal, and the second step concatenates
likewise.
isOrderGeSeq_concat: the conditions (1′)–(4′) of Definition 66 concatenate.markedEnd_concat_iff: a property of the induced marked ideal and boundary at the end of a concatenation is the same property at the end of the second sequence for the first sequence's induced data,Π^{-1}_{S ++ T *}(I, m) = Π^{-1}_{T *}(Π^{-1}_{S *}(I, m), m)and(S ++ T)^{-1}_{tot} E = T^{-1}_{tot}(S^{-1}_{tot} E), stated without a transport of the end results (the two ends are definitionally equal along the recursion onS), so that noeqToHomappears, as indisjoint_cosupp_concat_iffofHironaka/Scheme/BlowUpSequence/ConcatTransforms.lean.
A smooth blow-up sequence of order ≥ m for (X, I, m, E) followed by one of order ≥ m for
the induced marked data at its end is a smooth blow-up sequence of order ≥ m for (X, I, m, E)
[Kol07, Definition 66, conditions (1′)–(4′)]; the marked analogue of isOrderSeq_concat.
A property of the induced marked ideal and boundary at the end of S ++ T is the same
property at the end of T for the data induced by S [Kol07, Definition 66, condition (1′)],
stated without a transport of the end results, by recursion on S (nil: the two sides
coincide; cons: the recursive call on the tail with the one-step transforms).