Documentation

HironakaExamples.Balanced.Tuned

The tuned ideal I + D(I)² at m = 2: the general facts #

[Kol07, Proposition 99] for the maximal coefficient ideal W_s(I) at m = 2, s = m! = 2 = 1·lcm(2): W_2(I) = I + D(I)² (W_two_eq of Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Tuning.Assemble, in the sheaf vocabulary) is MC-invariant (99.5) and D-balanced (99.8). Here these facts are proved for the intrinsic derivative ideal Ideal.derivative k of Hironaka.Derivative on any k-algebra, with no hypothesis on I, the form the polynomial-ring examples HironakaExamples.Balanced.Example11 and Example106 (Kollár's Examples 11 and 106) instantiate:

The same facts in coordinates on a regular local ring are RegularCoords.isMCInvariant_W and RegularCoords.isDBalanced_W of Hironaka.Local; nothing here redefines W.

theorem Ideal.derivative_sup_derivative_sq {k : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [CommRing k] [CommRing A] [Algebra k A] (I : Ideal A) :
derivative k (I ⊔ derivative k I ^ 2) = derivative k I

D(I + D(I)²) = D(I) (the computation behind [Kol07, Proposition 99] at m = 2).

theorem Ideal.isDBalanced_sup_derivative_sq {k : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [CommRing k] [CommRing A] [Algebra k A] (I : Ideal A) :
IsDBalanced k (I ⊔ derivative k I ^ 2) 2

[Kol07, Proposition 99 (8)] at m = 2, s = 2, for the intrinsic derivative ideal: I + D(I)² is D-balanced with respect to 2, since D(I + D(I)²)² = D(I)² ⊆ I + D(I)².

theorem Ideal.mcInvariant_sup_derivative_sq {k : Type u_1} {A : Type u_2} [CommRing k] [CommRing A] [Algebra k A] (I : Ideal A) :
derivative k (I ⊔ derivative k I ^ 2) * derivative k (I ⊔ derivative k I ^ 2) ≤ I ⊔ derivative k I ^ 2

[Kol07, Proposition 99 (5)] at m = 2, for the intrinsic derivative ideal: I + D(I)² is MC-invariant with respect to 2, MC(W)·D(W) = D(W)·D(W) ⊆ W (MC(W) = D^{2−1}(W) = D(W)).