Documentation

HironakaExamples.Monomial.Examples

The example states of the monomial procedure #

Concrete states of Hironaka/Resolution/Algebraic/Monomial/State.lean on which the procedure of [Kol07, 111, Step 3] is computed, and the maximal-multiplicity procedure that [Kol07, Example 112] refutes. The computations themselves are in HironakaExamples/Monomial/Example112.lean (which is imported by the root) and in HironakaExamples/MonomialState.lean and HironakaExamples/MonomialRestrict.lean.

Example 112 #

The surface of [Kol07, Example 112]: E¹, E² two curves intersecting at a point with a₁ = a₂ = m + 1, as a state with components 0, 1 (labels 0, 1, the curves E¹, E²), nerve {0}, {1}, {0, 1}, exponents m + 1, n = 2.

Equations
Instances For

    The maximal-multiplicity choice ([Kol07, 111, Step 3], the "usual method" that Kollár rejects), defined for the computations only: the faces of maximal sum ≥ m, with the lexicographically largest label tuple as the tie-break (Kollár's E² ∩ E³ in Example 112; the other tie-break gives the same exponents by symmetry).

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      k steps of the maximal-multiplicity procedure: the final state and the list of centres, in order.

      Equations
      Instances For

        The maximal-multiplicity locus before the tie-break: the faces of maximal sum ≥ m (Kollár's "highest multiplicity locus"); maxMultChoice is its tie-break.

        Equations
        Instances For

          The centres of six steps of the maximal-multiplicity procedure on Example 112 under the other tie-break (the lexicographically smallest label tuple): the point {0, 1}, then {0, 2} (Kollár's E¹ ∩ E³ instead of E² ∩ E³), then the unique maximizers {2, 3}, {3, 4}, {4, 5}, {5, 6}; the exponents come out the same by symmetry.

          Equations
          Instances For

            The three-phase instance #

            An instance in which all three phases act: n = 3, m = 8, one component per label, exponents 4, 9, 3, 6, maximal faces {0} and {1, 2, 3}.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              The split example #

              The fine split of the boundary E¹ = V(x(x-1)), E² = V(y(y-1)) of 𝔸²: the four lines V(x), V(x-1) (label 0) and V(y), V(y-1) (label 1) with the exponents 1, 0, 1, 0 of I = (xy) along them, m = 1; the nerve is the four double points.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                The same on U = D((x-1)(y-1)): the components 1, 3 (V(x-1), V(y-1)) are dead, the nerve is {0}, {2}, {0, 2}.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  The coarse split, one exponent per member as in [Kol07, Definition–Lemma 110] with members not assumed irreducible: on X = 𝔸², E¹ = V(x(x-1)), E² = V(y(y-1)) with the coarse exponents c_j = min_D ord_D (xy) = 0, 0; m = 1; nerve {0}, {1}, {0, 1}.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    The coarse split on U = D((x-1)(y-1)): E¹|_U = V(x) and E²|_U = V(y) are irreducible, so the coarse exponents are 1, 1.

                    Equations
                    Instances For