Step 1 of order reduction: properties of the tuned triple #
Step 1 of the proof of [Kol07, Theorem 103] replaces the ideal I of a triple (X, I, E) with
max-ord I = m by the maximal coefficient ideal W(I) = W_s(I) of [Kol07, Corollary 101], which
is D-balanced and MC-invariant and for which order reduction is equivalent to order reduction for
I. This module states, for the tuned triple T.tuned m hm = (X, W_{s(m)}(I), E),
what the sheaf-level theory of tuning (Hironaka/Resolution/Algebraic/Tuning/) gives:
- the scheme and the divisor are unchanged and the ideal is
W_{s(m)}(I), definitionally (tuned_X,tuned_I,tuned_E,hasDimLE_tuned); - for
max-ord I = m ≥ 1, the tuned ideal has maximal orders(m), is D-balanced and MC-invariant with respect tos(m), and a smooth blow-up sequence is of ordermforTiff it is of orders(m)for the tuned triple (maxOrd_tuned,isDBalanced_tuned,isMCInvariant_tuned,isOrderSeq_tuned_iff; [Kol07, Theorem 100 and Corollary 101]); - clause (1) of Theorem 103 transfers back through the tuning: along a smooth blow-up sequence of
order
mfor(X, I, E), the final transform ofW_{s(m)}(I)has maximal order< s(m)iff that ofIhas maximal order< m(maxOrd_weakTransformSeq_lt_iff_tuned). Pointwise,ord_x I_r ≥ mifford_x W_r ≥ s(m)at the last stage; a supremum inℕ∞of orders is< s, for a natural numbers ≥ 1, iff every order is< s(maxOrd_lt_iff_forall_ord_lt), so the two suprema are below their marks together; - tuning commutes with the two functoriality inputs of clause (2), the pull-back of triples along
a smooth morphism and the change of fields ([Kol07, 34.1–34.2]), because the maximal coefficient
ideal commutes with smooth pull-back and with base change (
isPullbackOf_tuned,isBaseChangeOf_tuned); - clause (1) of
BODataread pointwise and ascosupp(I_r, m) = ∅(BOData.ord_weakTransformSeq_lt,BOData.cosupp_eq_empty), and the domain unfolded (boClass_iff); - the order condition of [Kol07, Definition 66] for
(X, I, E)at ordermand for(X, J, E)at orderm'share the smoothness and normal-crossings clauses, which are computed from the centres alone, so they are equivalent as soon as the order clausesord_{Z_i} I_i = mandord_{Z_i} J_i = m'are, stage by stage (isOrderSeq_iff_of_ordAlongEq_iff; the remark onEin the proof of Corollary 101).
Clause (1) of [Kol07, Theorem 103] read pointwise: the final birational transform has order
< m at every point, an order being at most the maximal order.
Clause (1) of [Kol07, Theorem 103] as the emptiness of the cosupport: no point of the final
stage has order ≥ m, cosupp(I_r, m) = ∅.
The domain of BO_{n,m} unfolded: 1 ≤ m, dim X ≤ n and max-ord I ≤ m.
The ideal of the tuned triple is the maximal coefficient ideal W_{s(m)}(I).
For max-ord I = m ≥ 1 the tuned ideal has maximal order s(m) ([Kol07, Theorem 54.2 (i)]
for the exponent m!; maxOrd_W for an arbitrary exponent).
For max-ord I = m ≥ 1 the tuned ideal is D-balanced with respect to s(m)
([Kol07, Corollary 101]).
For max-ord I = m ≥ 1 the tuned ideal is MC-invariant with respect to s(m)
([Kol07, Corollary 101]).
For max-ord I = m ≥ 1, a smooth blow-up sequence is of order m for T iff it is of order
s(m) for the tuned triple ([Kol07, Corollary 101]).
For a natural number s ≥ 1, the maximal order of an ideal sheaf is < s iff its order at
every point is < s: both say that every order is ≤ s − 1, and ℕ∞ has no limit point below a
natural number. Not in the sources.
Along a smooth blow-up sequence of order m for (X, I, E) with max-ord I = m ≥ 1, the
final birational transform of the tuned ideal has maximal order < s(m) iff that of I has
maximal order < m. Not in the sources; it carries clause (1) of [Kol07, Theorem 103] from the
tuned triple back to (X, I, E). The pointwise statement is
Hironaka.BD.le_ord_weakTransformSeq_iff_tuned at the last stage; the two suprema are compared
through maxOrd_lt_iff_forall_ord_lt.
The tuned triple of a pull-back along a smooth morphism is the pull-back of the tuned triple:
the maximal coefficient ideal commutes with smooth pull-back (W_comap_of_smooth), as the
derivatives do. Used for [Kol07, 34.1].
The tuned triple of a change of fields is the change of fields of the tuned triple: the
maximal coefficient ideal commutes with base change along a field extension
(W_comap_of_isPullback_specMap). Used for [Kol07, 34.2].
The order condition of [Kol07, Definition 66] across a change of ideal: the smoothness and
normal-crossings clauses depend only on the centres, so the conditions for (I, m) and (J, m')
are equivalent once the order clauses are, stage by stage. This is the remark on the role of E in
the proof of [Kol07, Corollary 101]: adding E "poses the same restriction" on both.