CP1 along Step 2, and the Step 2 descent along the tower #
Step 2 of the proof of [Kol07, Theorem 103] on a triple with a smooth hypersurface of maximal
contact is Step 2.1 followed by Step 2.2 (step2Seq,
Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.OrderReduction.Step22RestrictToHypersurface). The statement CP1 of
the embedded desingularization (Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedChainRelative) along
it (cp1For_step2Seq) is cp1For_concat of CP1 along Step 2.1 (cp1For_step21Seq; no centre there
contains c̃) and CP1 along Step 2.2 at the lifted generic point (cp1For_step22). The tower step
(cp1BOAt_succ_of_cp1BMOAt):
BO_{n+1,1} is evaluated through the local cover of [Kol07, Theorem 105], on whose pieces a
hypersurface of maximal contact exists and the run is Step 2 on the tuned triple
(functor_seq_localClass, maxContactCase at max-ord I = 1, the tuning at the mark 1 being
the identity); CP1 on the pieces descends to the triple (cp1For_of_pullback_cover, the functor
commuting with the cover), and the inductive input is the stage-n marked family read through the
amalgam (amalgam_seq, seq_congr_mark). The tower induction is that of [Kol07, 70]. Used in
Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedCP1Tower and
Hironaka.Resolution.Algebraic.Wlo05.EmbeddedCP3Tower.
CP1 along Step 2 with the data bdData (Step 2 of the proof of [Kol07, Theorem 103]), from
cp1For_step21Seq and cp1For_step22 through cp1For_concat.
cp1For_step2Seq at a mark m = 1 carried as a variable: the form the tuned triple of
maxContactCase produces, whose mark is tuningParam 1.
The Step 2 descent along the tower (Step 2 of the proof of [Kol07, Theorem 103],
[Kol07, Theorem 105], [Kol07, 104]): BO_{n+1,1} on a triple is evaluated through the local cover
of Theorem 105, on whose pieces a hypersurface of maximal contact exists and the run is Step 2 on
the tuned triple; CP1 there is cp1For_step2Seq with the stage-n marked family as the inductive
input, and it descends to the triple along the cover.